Source: Financial Times, 6th June 2010
Investors are entitled to ask why they should employ the services of an active commodities fund manager if we are indeed in the midst of a natural resources supercycle in which passive commodities funds should all prosper. Why should they pay the extra fees levied by active managers given that a succession of research papers has shown that active managers fail, on aggregate, to beat their benchmarks?





Twitter
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Yahoo
Technorati
Facebook
LinkedIn